International Auditing Standards Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

International Auditing Standards - Essay typesetters caseISA 400 provided a description of internal control and the types of internal controls, as well as the factors and procedures include in each type.One of managements responsibilities is to ensure that there are adequate internal controls implemented in an entity. What is required of the studyor is to suffer a sufficient understanding of the internal control as such an understanding give mean a more efficient and effective scrutinise planning and audit approach. According to Ricchiute (2003), in actual application, to obtain such an understanding, the auditor will need to coif the following (1) perform a preliminary go off of the internal control trunk through the review of prior-year audit working papers, inquiries of management and personnel and observations (2) document the internal controls found in the strategy and identify transaction cycles, either through a flowchart or a narrative enrolment (3) perform a walk- through of a sample transaction and, (4) identify controls that will reduce to an gratifying or low level the risk of material misstatements (Ricchiute, 2003, p. 214 - 220). In number 4, the auditor may pick out to perform only a walkthrough of a transaction or a walkthrough of the transactions and the associate controls and running game of controls. The choice depends on the auditors assessment of control risk. If the assessment is high, the auditor will just do a walkthrough of a sample transaction and go directly to real testing. If the assessment is low, the auditor will have to perform a more detailed walkthrough, not only of the transaction but also of the related controls, and test the controls the auditor thinks will support the lower risk assessment. The understanding of the internal control system and the subsequent walkthrough or testing is critical to the outside(a) auditor since this will dictate the substantive audit procedures that will be done subsequently. Thi s is because a lower level of control risk assessment will decrease the level of detection risk of an auditor. This generally means less extensive and persuasive substantive audit procedures that could be done during the interim rather than during the year-end, resulting to earlier completion of the audit work (Ricchiute, 2003, p. 232). What slightly fraud concerns, as these is one of the purposes for setting up the internal control system, in the first place An external auditors procedures cannot be expected to detect immaterial frauds. If a fraudulent transaction or event results to a material misstatement in the financial statements, the external auditors audit procedures may discover the fraud incident. However, there is sure as shooting no guarantee of detection as the perpetrator(s) may go to extensive lengths to deceive the auditor and cover up the defalcation (Tedd). Lastly, one of the concerns regarding ISA 400 (and the other auditing standards) is that this may